Launch Vehicle Rendezvous to Catalogued Orbital Debris while Injecting into Highly-Inclined Orbits

TitleLaunch Vehicle Rendezvous to Catalogued Orbital Debris while Injecting into Highly-Inclined Orbits
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsGolubek, AV, Dron', NM
Short TitleNauka innov.
DOI10.15407/scin16.06.046
Volume16
Issue6
SectionScientific Basis of Innovation Activity
Pagination46-55
LanguageUkrainian
Abstract
Introduction. A constant increase in the amount of space debris already constitutes a significant threat to satellites in nearEarth orbits, starting with the trajectory of their launch vehicle injection.
Problem Statement. Design and development of various modern methods of protection against space debris requires knowledge of the statistical characteristics of the distribution of the kinematic parameters of the simultaneous motion of a launch vehicle injecting satellite and a group of space debris objects in the area of its trajectory.
Purpose. Development of a mathematical model of a launch vehicle rendezvous with a group of observable orbital debris while injecting a satellite into near-earth orbits with an altitude of up to 2100 km and an inclination from 45 to 90 degrees. 
Materials and Methods. The following methods are used in the research: analysis, synthesis, comparison, simulation modeling, statistical processing of experimental results, approximation, correlation analysis, and the least squares method. 
Results. The simultaneous motion of a launch vehicle and a group of space debris objects has been studied. The distributions of relative distance, relative velocity, angle of encounter, and moments of time of approach of a launch vehicle to a group of the observed space debris at a relative distance of less than 5 km have been obtained. The dependence of the average rendezvous concentration on the distribution of space debris across the average altitude of the orbit and the inclination of the target orbit of the launch vehicle has been determined. The dependence of the average probability of rendezvous in the launch on the inclination of the target orbit, the number of orbital debris, and the relative distance of the rendezvous has been determined.
Conclusions. The obtained mathematical model of rendezvous of a launch vehicle with a group of observed orbital debris can be used while designing means of cleaning the near-Earth space and systems to protect modern satellite launch vehicles from orbital debris. In addition, the results of the research can be used to assess the impact of unobserved orbital debris on the flight of a launch vehicle.
Keywordscatalogued orbital debris, launch vehicle, model, mutual motion
References

1. Veniaminov, S. S. (2013). Space debris is a threat to humanity. Moscow [in Russian].
2. Dron', M., Golubek, A., Dubovik, L., Dreus, A., Heti, K. (2019). Analysis of ballistic aspects in the combined method for removing space objects from the near-earth orbits. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/5(98), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.161778
3. Alpatov, A. P., Paliy, O. S., Skorik, О. D. (2017). The development of structural design and the selection of design parameters of aerodynamic systems for de-orbiting upper-stage rocket launcher. Sci. innov., 13(4), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine13.04.029
4. Dron', N. М., Dubovik, L. G., Golubek, A. V., Dreus, A. Yu., Yemets, V. V., Pashkov, A. V. (2019). Systems for the removal of space objects from low earth orbits. Monograph. Dnipro [in Ukrainian].
5. Dron', N. M., Horolsky, P. G., Dubovik, L. G. (2014). Ways of reduction of technogenic pollution of the near-earth space. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, 3(141), 125-130 [in Russian].
6. Yemets, V., Harkness, P., Dron, M., Pashkov, A., Worrall, K., Middleton, M. (2018). Autophage engines: toward a throttleable solid motor. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 55(4), 984-992. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34153
7. Golubek, A. V. (2018). Launch vehicle rendezvous with cataloged space objects during insertion into orbits with low inclination. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Маchine Building, 2(695), 86-98 [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.18698/0536-1044-2018-2-86-98
8. Golubek, A. V. (2014). Investigation of mutual approaches of the launch vehicle in the active section of the trajectory with space objects. Journal of rocket-space technology, 4(22), 26-35 [in Russian].
9. Golubek, A. V. (2015). The characteristics of the rendezvous of the launch vehicle with space objects in injection into equatorial orbits analysis. Journal of rocket-space technology, 4(23), 32-41 [in Russian].
10. Golubek, A. V. (2016). The characteristics of the rendezvous of the launch vehicle with space objects in injection into orbits with inclination 45 deg analysis. Journal of rocket-space technology, 4(24), 20-28 [in Russian].
11. GOST R 25645.167-2005. Space environment (natural and artificial). Model of spatial and time distribution for space debris flux density in LEO. Moscow, 2005. [in Russian].
12. Nazarenko, A. I. (2013). Modeling of space debris. Moscow [in Russian].
13. Klinkrad, H. (2006). Space Debris - Models and Risk Analysis. Springer-Verlag.
14. Steel, D. Assessment of the Orbital Debris Collision Hazard for Low-Earth Orbit Satellites. URL: http://www.duncansteel.com/archives/1425 (Last accessed: 22.04.19).
15. Anz-Meador, P. (2000). GEO Evolve 1.0: A Long-Term Debris Evolution Model for the Geosynchronous Belt. Orbital Debris. Quarterly News, 5-7. URL: http://www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/newsletter/pdfs/ODQNv5i4.pdf (Last accessed: 22.04.2019).
16. Patera, R. P. Patent of USA N 2004/0024527 A1. Vehicular trajectory collision conflict prediction method.
17. Firooz, A. A., Rongier, I., Wilde, P. D., Sgobba, T. (2013). Safety design for space operations. Elsevier Ltd.
18. Vittaldev, V. (2013). Collision probability for space objects using gaussian mixture models. Spaceflight mechanics, 148(13-351), 1-20.
19. Serra, R., Arzelier, D., Joldes, M., Lasserre, J.-B., Rondepierre, A., Salvy, B. (2016). Fast and Accurate Computation of Orbital Collision Probability for Short-Term Encounters. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 39(5), 1009 1021. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001353
20. Shelton, C. T., Junkins, J. L. (2019). Probability of collision between space objects including model uncertainty. Acta Astronautica, 155, 462-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.11.051
21. Alfano, S. (2006). Satellite Collision Probability Enhancements. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 29(3), 588- 592. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.15523
22. Labutkina, Т. V., Petrenko, A. N. (2013). A new aspect of modeling a multi-element system of orbital objects. Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". A series of "Information and Modeling", 19, 60-74 [in Russian].
23. Igdalov, I. M., Kuchma, L. D., Poliakov, N. V., Sheptun, Yu. D. (2013). Dynamic designing of rockets. Dynamic problems of rockets and their space stages. Monograph. (Ed. S. N. Konyukhov). Dnipropetrovsk.
24. Adzhian, A. P., Akim, E. L., Alifanov, O. M., Andreev, A. N. (2012). Mechanical engineering encyclopedia. Т. IV-22: Aerospace technology. Book 1. Moscow [in Russian].
25. Sikharulidze, Yu. G. (2011). Ballistics and homing of flying vehicles. Moscow. [in Russian].
26. Alekseev, Yu. S., Balabey, Yu. E., Baryshnikova, Т. А. et. al. (2012). Design of control systems for objects of rocket and space technology. Vol. 1. Design of control systems for launch vehicles: Textbook. (Eds. Yu. S. Alekseev, Yu. M. Zlatkin, V. S. Krivtsov, A. S. Kulik, V. I. Chumachenko). Kharkov [in Russian].